![]() |
FrugalInvestor.net |
| Low Expense Value Investing Strategies for Long Term Investors | |
|---|---|
| Home About Us Contact Us Why be a FrugalInvestor? Guideline to Frugal Investing Choosing the right stocks Stock Recommendations Disclaimer |
3M (MMM) is a high quality company selling below it's fair value. This company produces many products -
well beyond its scotch tape brands that it is so well known for. 29% of 2006
revenues came from its industrial and transportation division, 17% came from its health care
division, 16.4% came from its display and graphics division, 14% came from its consumer and office
division, 11.4% came from the safety security and protection division and lastly, 11% came
from its Electro and Communications division. Buying this company is like buying 6 companies
in one. There is not one product that is sexy or exciting but this does not matter because somehow
this company can command a huge 50% overall margin with all the products it sells. The company has been
getting into higher growth areas such as optical films for LCD TVs and has made some biotech acquisitions
recently. 63% of its sales are from overseas so it is a good way to play the growth of international markets.
The combination of high margins, high ROIC, and low tax rates makes this company a good buy.
The company will report earnings and have a conference call on Thursday April 26th. Already, management has set Wall Street expectations low and commented that the first quarter will be one of 3M's most challenging for the year. Given that expectations are already low for the company and other industrials such as United Technologies and Honeywell have reported better than expected earnings, 3M may get a pop in its stock price with any better than expected earnings report. The Q4 2006 earnings report resulted in a 5.4% decline in 3M's stock price. Hopefully Q1 2007's earnings report will be better than Wall Street expects. We have already placed our bets that there is better than even odds for this to happen. Even if it doesn't, the company is already undervalued even with conservative valuation assumptions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||